What’s bigger, faster, cheaper, and lower-power than the biggest, newest 65nm and 40nm FPGAs?
ASICs, of course.
OK, I can hear you already –
“That’s not a fair comparison.”
“You need a team of 50 experts to design a high-end ASIC.”
“By the time you factor in NRE and mask costs, ASIC costs a lot more unless your volume is in the millions.”
“ASIC has very long design cycles.”
Electronic system level (ESL) design has struggled to convince doubters that it’s more than a marketing TLA. But the most visibly productive ESL tools in recent years have been those that synthesize C into lower-level RTL. Doing logic synthesis from C has been a long-time vision for raising the level of abstraction of design. But the history of the technology, which predates the ESL phenom, is checkered and has left a sour taste in many designers’ mouths. Each new offering has had to convince rather dubious prospects that they were different from what had … Read More → "ESL Gets a New Taker"
“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the (patent) lawyers.” – William Shakespeare: Henry the Sixth, Part 2, Act IV, Scene II (sort of)
Where would our industry be without patents? Indeed, what kind of world would we live in if there were no patents or patent rights?
It would be a better place, that’s what.
It’s an idea worth exploring, if for no other reason than to inject some much-needed sanity into the current climate … Read More → "Let’s Abolish All Patents"
For years now, FPGA companies have been proclaiming that you can use their devices to create a “System on a Chip.” We’ve seen “SoCs,” “Programmable System-on-Chip.” “SoPC,” “Platform FPGA,” and numerous other marketing-oriented, pseudo-jargonic phraseologies.
Supposing that’s true, and we want to put a “system” onto a chip. What exactly is a “system”?
Wikipedia tells us a “system” is a “set of interacting or interdependent entities, real or abstract, forming an integrated … Read More → "Complexitango"
Supposing that’s true, and we want to put a “system” onto a chip. What exactly is a “system”?
Wikipedia tells us a “system” is a “set of interacting or interdependent entities, real or abstract, forming an integrated whole.” An “embedded system” is widely accepted as a computer that is integrated or embedded into some other device. For our purposes today, though, I’d like to go with the definition offered by a former colleague of mine:
“A ‘ … Read More → "Complexitango"
A few weeks ago we started a look at Logic Non-Volatile Memory (Logic NVM) options. These are non-volatile memories intended for embedding in SoCs using only standard logic processes instead of the more complicated processes designed to optimize large quantities of memory. We looked at one-time programmable (OTP) versions, which, not too surprisingly, can be programmed only once. We also looked at multiple-time programmable (MTP) versions, which can in general be programmed 100,000+ times while maintaining a data retention time of 10 years or more even on the 100,000th programming.
But there’s another … Read More → "A Non-Volatile Middle Ground"
Better, stronger, faster. Isn’t that what every new microprocessor is supposed to deliver? Hope springs eternal in the breast of many a processor-marketing drone. Their new chip isn’t just better than the previous one, it’s better than everyone else’s, too.
And you know, sometimes that promise actually comes true. A case in point is the XAP5 processor from Cambridge Consultants, a company of consultants located in – wait for it – Cambridge, England. Actually, they’re located in Cambridge, Massachusetts as well, a choice … Read More → "Citius, Altius, Fortius"
Many of us toss the process node into casual conversation, pretending we know what it actually means… “I hear that SilBlaster is already working on a 37nm FPGA based on TSMC’s medium-K, oxide-minimized, semi-strained, anti-dielectric half-pitch.” (If you get enough things that sound like buzzwords in there, most people will be too frightened to challenge you.)
In reality, though, most of us designing products with programmable logic are pretty well insulated from the vagaries of semiconductor processes. When I got my first car that had four valves per cylinder, … Read More → "How Many Nanometers Do I Need?"
We seem to have this love/hate relationship with software. We like it because it’s so durn flexible and we can implement changes quickly. Well, unless we really hose things up. But you have to be a real goober to need a change that takes longer than a hardware change*. I mean a real hardware change, like a silicon spin.
But there’s a problem with software: it’s slow. Since the dawn of time, man has labored to find ways to make software go faster. OK, so maybe more like the dawn … Read More → "Yet Another Twist on Making Software Faster"
The problem exists in all areas of electronics, from EDA through manufacturing to system developers, and in most geographical markets. It regularly crops up in conversations and seems to be part of a general trend away from Science/Engineering/Technology in Western countries.
A quick browse around some recent publications shows that a lot of work is going into analysing the problem, but nobody has yet come up with any serious suggestions as to how it can be solved.
For example, IEEE USA’s today’s engineer ran a long piece … Read More → "HFame Academy for Engineers?"
