feature article
Subscribe Now

Burning the Secret Sauce

When Paranoia Impedes Progress

“Our new RuleBuster DRC tool has successfully verified a one billion transistor 65nm design for… uh… a very large semiconductor company.”  The presenter blushes a bit, looks annoyed, and then continues with his next PowerPoint slide.  The six people in the audience all know who he’s talking about, and they’re dutifully impressed.  He’s met the letter of the law on the agreement his company signed, although he is now far from the spirit of it.

When you make your living designing and selling electronic design automation (EDA) tools, issues of confidentiality and paranoia fly at you from all directions.  Some of the world’s largest semiconductor companies (Can we say Intel’s name here?  Whoops, there it goes!) have long-standing policies of not allowing suppliers to admit that their products were used by that company.  Apparently the “Intel Inside” marketing campaign style doesn’t apply both ways.  You won’t find a lot of chips from these manufacturers with “Synopsys Inside, Magma Inside, Cadence Inside, Mentor Inside, etc.” stamped on the top, even though products from all four of these companies (and likely more) were likely involved in getting that chip into the socket.

We don’t mean to single out Intel here – a lot of semiconductor and systems companies have similar policies and similar motivations.  They feel that the tools, services, and IP that go into bringing their products to life all become part of their “Secret Sauce” and that withholding that information keeps their rivals at a competitive disadvantage.

Yeah, right.

Let’s say hypothetically that you work for a competitive semiconductor company (Oh, it looks from our subscriber rolls like many of you do.  Welcome!), and you’re dealing with the problem of layout verification.  Let’s have a quick show of hands as to how many of you wouldn’t know to check some of the four companies listed above?  Oh, not too many hands in the air.  OK, you two – go Google “layout verification” – yep, Mentor, Synopsys, CDN (that’s stock-market-ese for Cadence), a bunch of academic references…  Whew! That big trade secret took us awhile to crack.

Nonetheless, EDA and IP companies often have their hands tied by their customers, protecting the identities of users of the same products they’re spending millions to advertise.  Every member of the marketing and field team that works with the customer in question must be briefed and warned, PowerPoint presentations must be scrubbed, and press releases are audited to make sure that word doesn’t leak out that they have happy, successful customers using their products.  When they go to meet with a new prospective customer, the question will inevitably arise –

“Do you have other customers using this product?”

“Definitely.”

“Who are they?”

“Can’t say, but trust me, they love it.”

“Gee, thanks.  That’s very helpful.”

It would be easy to stop the blame with the systems and semiconductor companies, but this virus runs much deeper than that.  The EDA companies themselves are similarly afflicted.  Go to any tradeshow, like, say, the Design Automation Conference (to choose a random example), and look at what’s in the booths on the show floor.  The answer is… “Fluff.”  You’ll see lots of signage about how each company is “The Leader in Franistan Reticulation,” accompanied by pitches from paid actors who rattle off technology terms without a clue as to their meaning and sixty-inch plasma monitors showing slick flash videos of animated characters rollerblading along metal traces and falling victim to evil electro-migration.

Not exactly what we need to get our jobs done.

If you want any real information, you need to sign up for access to the sacred suites.  This is a process that ranges in difficulty – we’d estimate somewhat harder than getting through airline security, but easier than escaping from a federal detention facility.  Once inside, of course, you’ll be greeted by the Good catered food and lots of other potential customers wearing their badges backward and trying to look inconspicuous.  You’ll slide into a seat in the back of a mini-meeting room, and, when the presenter pauses briefly from pushing power optimization to a new level of abstraction, you quietly ask “Do you have any customers using this product?” Oh, wait.  We’ve been there already.

I once worked on a giant software development project at an EDA company, and my team was hamstrung by complex security requirements mandated to keep our archrivals from guessing what we were up to.  Our engineers jumped through hoops and ran through virtual obstacle courses trying to get their jobs done while protecting the secret sauce.  It often seemed like we spent more time babysitting our security measures than we did developing code. 

Of course, two of the members of the team were married to employees of competitive companies, our own company had a massive marketing campaign designed to create a buzz about the new technology we were developing, we had filed patent applications that made it perfectly clear what we were working on, and some of our engineers were presenting papers at technical conferences explaining details of the algorithms.  Nonetheless, our source code was safe.  So safe, in fact, that the folks that wrote it couldn’t often get it to compile successfully.  We wondered aloud whether the best defense against our unseen industrial spies might be to just tar-up the source code and send it to them.  They’d probably be tied up for years just getting the make files set up right.

The kind of proprietary paranoia that causes these misguided company behaviors is not without foundation.  There are well publicized cases of EDA company engineers defecting with entire product lines and trying (with varying degrees of success) to sell them to competitive companies.  For the most part, large technology companies are too smart to take advantage of these unethical and illegal offers.  On the rare occasion when they’re not, prison terms are not unheard of. 

On the semiconductor side, there are well-established companies that make their living doing nothing but reverse-engineering high-profile devices.  Once the buffing compounds and scanning electron microscopes start to work, no secret is safe for long.  Competitors can purchase detailed reports for a small fortune, but the insight gained is seldom profound. 

Particularly in these days of domination by fabless companies, few people have any real process advantage.  Everybody starts from the same “go” square with the same semiconductor processes available to them, the same third-party IP to speed up their design cycle, and the same array of EDA tools to stitch it all together and make sure it works.  Real competitive advantage is typically gained by the tiny percentage of software and hardware in the design that’s truly original and by the novel application of all those standard ingredients to make something that solves an important customer problem well.

However, the mapping between the security measures and the actual threats faced by these companies trying to protect their intellectual property and competitive advantage is tenuous at best.  The real reason that trade secrets migrate around the industry is the incessant turnover of engineering talent and the constant migration of key technologists from one company to another.  Perhaps if companies focused more on keeping their key talent in place, they’d have far fewer leaks of critical technology to the competition.  After all, if it wasn’t easier for us as engineers to get a bigger salary, a better title, a faster promotion, or more recognition by changing companies than it is to stay where we are, we wouldn’t often go through the trauma of a job change.  All too often, however, companies skimp on these things with their loyal, long-term employees while simultaneously pulling out the stops to recruit that seemingly indispensable engineer that’s leaving their competitor.  Unfortunately, you almost always get the behavior you reward.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
May 24, 2024
Could these creepy crawly robo-critters be the first step on a slippery road to a robot uprising coupled with an insect uprising?...
May 23, 2024
We're investing in semiconductor workforce development programs in Latin America, including government and academic partnerships to foster engineering talent.The post Building the Semiconductor Workforce in Latin America appeared first on Chip Design....

featured video

Why Wiwynn Energy-Optimized Data Center IT Solutions Use Cadence Optimality Explorer

Sponsored by Cadence Design Systems

In the AI era, as the signal-data rate increases, the signal integrity challenges in server designs also increase. Wiwynn provides hyperscale data centers with innovative cloud IT infrastructure, bringing the best total cost of ownership (TCO), energy, and energy-itemized IT solutions from the cloud to the edge.

Learn more about how Wiwynn is developing a new methodology for PCB designs with Cadence’s Optimality Intelligent System Explorer and Clarity 3D Solver.

featured paper

Achieve Greater Design Flexibility and Reduce Costs with Chiplets

Sponsored by Keysight

Chiplets are a new way to build a system-on-chips (SoCs) to improve yields and reduce costs. It partitions the chip into discrete elements and connects them with a standardized interface, enabling designers to meet performance, efficiency, power, size, and cost challenges in the 5 / 6G, artificial intelligence (AI), and virtual reality (VR) era. This white paper will discuss the shift to chiplet adoption and Keysight EDA's implementation of the communication standard (UCIe) into the Keysight Advanced Design System (ADS).

Dive into the technical details – download now.

featured chalk talk

Connectivity Solutions for Smart Trailers
Smart trailers can now be equipped with a wide variety of interconnection systems including wire-to-wire, wire-to-board, and high-speed data solutions. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton and Blaine Dudley from TE Connectivity explore the evolution of smart trailer technology, the different applications within a trailer where connectivity would be valuable, and how TE Connectivity is encouraging innovation in the world of smart trailer technology.
Oct 6, 2023
28,806 views