fish fry
Subscribe Now

Reducing the Odds of Failure

Creating High-Integrity, Reliable Software with AdaCore

In today’s high-reliability embedded systems, failure is not an option. Not only is failure not an option, a bug in the software could result in catastrophic consquences. In this week’s episode of Fish Fry, we tackle these very issues with Quentin Ochem from AdaCore. Quentin and I discuss the myriad of challenges surrounding high-integrity, high-reliability software development, the benefits of AdaCore’s GNAT Pro software development suite, and how AdaCore’s GNAT Pro was used in the ExoMars program. Also this week, I unveil the winners of this year’s “Make It With Ada” contest and explain why having a solid strategy for signal integrity is crucial to your next system design.


 

Download this episode (right click and save)

Links for December 2, 2016

More information about AdaCore

Winners Announced for First Annual “Make with Ada” Programming Competition

New Episode of Chalk Talk: SI? Why Do I Care?

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
May 24, 2019
It's Memorial Day in the US on Monday, and Cadence is off. So today is the day before a holiday. By tradition, I write about...whatever I feel like. So let's go with figures of speech. Even... [[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community s...
May 23, 2019
The Role Of EDA In AI Achieving Effective Verification and Validation of Vehicle E/E Systems – Part 4 Signal Integrity and high-speed design challenges: interview with Mentor’s Todd Westerhoff Designing For The Edge Benefits of a Digitalization Strategy for Electr...
May 23, 2019
Everybody loves webcasts, right? While some may view webcasts as these kids in Ferris Bueller’s class, others love the on-demand technical education available via this popular medium. In an attempt to appeal to the second group, Samtec is pleased to announce a new Chalk...
Jan 25, 2019
Let'€™s face it: We'€™re addicted to SRAM. It'€™s big, it'€™s power-hungry, but it'€™s fast. And no matter how much we complain about it, we still use it. Because we don'€™t have anything better in the mainstream yet. We'€™ve looked at attempts to improve conven...