feature article
Subscribe Now

Wi-Fi HaLow Close to Making Its Debut

Morse Micro Prepares Chips for New 802.11ah Standard

“Every day sees humanity more victorious in the struggle with space and time.” — Guglielmo Marconi

Well, that escalated quickly. Wi-Fi was invented only 20 years ago, and already there are 20 different standards based on it. There are the familiar 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz versions that we use on our laptops, but also 802.11ax, -aj, -bb, and more. They’re even starting to get names so we can keep them all straight, like Wi-Fi 6 and WiGig. 

Add to that list 802.11ah, also known as Wi-Fi HaLow (pronounced like “halo”). Unlike most of the other revisions, HaLow isn’t intended to be a faster, smarter, more expensive version of Wi-Fi for PCs and laptops. Just the opposite. It’s intended for IoT – the Wi-Fi for our stuff. 

What makes HaLow IoT-specific is its frequency band. While PCs crowd the airwaves at 2.4 and 5.0 GHz, HaLow sneaks in under the radar at around 900 MHz (in the U.S.). As any RF engineer will tell you, the lower the frequency, the longer the range, because it penetrates obstacles (walls, floors, etc.) better than higher frequencies do. The drawback is a lower data rate. With fewer waves to modulate, the longer wavelength means less encoded data per second. 

That’s not a problem for IoT devices. (Not yet, anyway.) Long range and obstacle immunity are more important than acing the Ookla speedtest

Just ’cause it’s low and slow doesn’t mean it’s dumb. HaLow has some spiffy modernized features that even our late-model laptops don’t have. The standard accommodates over 8000 separate devices all talking to one access point, for example. That’s likely to be important as and when HaLow-enabled gadgets start to become ubiquitous. If every camera, doorbell, refrigerator, and wind-up toy has an 802.11ah interface, there’s going to be a lot of simultaneous conversations going on. 

To manage that, HaLow defines a time-slicing mode where devices alternately sleep and wake in cycles, staying off the airwaves for predetermined periods. The access point can also bunch up groups of devices that share a wireless channel, doling out access to different groups in turn. This helps avoid the problem where widely separated devices that don’t know about each other try to broadcast at the same time. And, if you want to get fancy, your access point can aim different antennae in different directions and divide the world into geographic sectors. 

Overall, HaLow is expected to have 10× better range than “normal” Wi-Fi, partly because of its relatively low frequency and partly through its bandwidth-sharing measures. What that translates to in real life is anybody’s guess. If 802.11n has a nominal range of 100 meters, that means 802.11ah will reach 1000 meters. Sure. But even accounting for obstacles and interference, HaLow should reach pretty darned far, to use a technical term. 

We’ll have to wait and see, because there are no HaLow-equipped devices or access points yet to test. But we’re not far away. Morse Micro, a Sydney, Australia–based company, says it’s already sampling its one-chip controller, with production a handful of months away. The 48-pin device will have its own internal power amplifier, or it can be used with an external FEM and antenna for greater range. 

Morse Micro expects HaLow to catch on in home security cameras first, in part because of its increased range. There’s no use putting a camera in the backyard if it can’t reach the Wi-Fi router in the opposite end of the house, and it’s no fun running Ethernet cables up a tree, either. HaLow promises longer battery life to go with its longer wireless range, making it good for remote consumer devices. After that, who knows? 

 

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Dec 1, 2020
If you'€™d asked me at the beginning of 2020 as to the chances of my replicating an 1820 Welsh dresser, I would have said '€œzero,'€ which just goes to show how little I know....
Dec 1, 2020
More package designers these days, with the increasing component counts and more complicated electrical constraints, are shifting to using a front-end schematic capture tool. As with IC and PCB... [[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community site. ]...
Dec 1, 2020
UCLA’s Maxx Tepper gives us a brief overview of the Ocean High-Throughput processor to be used in the upgrade of the real-time event selection system of the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider). The board incorporates Samtec FireFly'„¢ optical cable ...
Nov 25, 2020
[From the last episode: We looked at what it takes to generate data that can be used to train machine-learning .] We take a break from learning how IoT technology works for one of our occasional posts on how IoT technology is used. In this case, we look at trucking fleet mana...

featured video

Improve SoC-Level Verification Efficiency by Up to 10X

Sponsored by Cadence Design Systems

Chip-level testbench creation, multi-IP and CPU traffic generation, performance bottleneck identification, and data and cache-coherency verification all lack automation. The effort required to complete these tasks is error prone and time consuming. Discover how the Cadence® System VIP tool suite works seamlessly with its simulation, emulation, and prototyping engines to automate chip-level verification and improve efficiency by ten times over existing manual processes.

Click here for more information about System VIP

featured paper

Keys to quick success using high-speed data converters

Sponsored by Texas Instruments

Whether you’re designing an aerospace system, test and measurement equipment or automotive lidar AFE, hardware designers using high-speed data converters face tough challenges with high-frequency inputs, outputs, clock rates and digital interface. Issues might include connecting with your field-programmable gate array, being confident that your first design pass will work or determining how to best model the system before building it. In this article, we take a look at each of these challenges.

Click here to download the whitepaper

Featured Chalk Talk

Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) Technology

Sponsored by Mouser Electronics and Texas Instruments

In industrial applications, crystals are not ideal for generating clock signal timing. They take up valuable PCB real-estate, and aren’t stable in harsh thermal and vibration environments. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Nick Smith from Texas Instruments about bulk acoustic wave (BAW) technology that offers an attractive alternative to crystals.

More information about Texas Instruments Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) Technology