feature article
Subscribe Now

I Come to Bury the Internet, and to Praise It, Part 3

The first two parts of this article dealt with getting new Internet service from TDS Telecom at my new home near St. George, Utah. It took a few days for a technician to come out and install 50 feet of coaxial cable from the utility pedestal located at the corner of my property to the house and then to install and provision the cable modem. In about an hour and a half, I had Internet. However, the technician was not able to use the pre-buried conduit for the outside cable run, so he had to run the coax along the ground to the house and leave cable burial to a better equipped contractor, who showed up a few days later. The contractor cleared the conduit run with a Craftsman wet/dry vacuum and then ran the existing coax through the conduit, all while I was taking a shower. Six days later, following the initial Friday installation of the cable modem, I switched the cable modem’s power cord from the wall to a surge-protected power strip, and the modem failed to reboot. A TDS Telecom technician came out the next day and replaced the modem with some effort. I had Internet service once more.

I am paying $39.95 a month to TDS Telecom for 300 Mbps Internet service plus $10 per month for the modem. After going through three cable modems in a week, I figure the $10 per month modem fee is more of an insurance policy. If I plug my laptop PC directly into the cable modem, I get a download speed of 330 Mbps. That’s a ten percent bonus! However, over WiFi, I’m getting just one half to one sixth of that bandwidth depending on time of day and the phase of the moon. So, abandoning the engineering maxim “If it works, leave it alone,” I decided to see if using a powerline modem to go from the cable modem to the study where I work would improve the throughput of my home Internet service.

Based on a YouTube video review, I decided to try a TP-Link AV2000 Passthrough Powerline Network Extender, which claims to be able to drive bits through my home wiring at 1 Gbps, each way. Impressive, if true, and far more than I need. Using these powerline modems is pretty simple. You plug one powerline modem into an outlet near your gateway or router. Plug the other powerline modem into an outlet near your computer. Pair the powerline modems by pressing the “Pair” button on each modem, and then wait. If everything works as it should, the two powerline modems quickly find each other and create a virtual Ethernet cable through your house wiring. They each light a little green LED to indicate successful pairing. No setup. No SSIDs or passwords. No Web page to figure out. Just a couple of buttons to press. Slick.

I ordered a pair of these powerline modems from Amazon for $90 with 2-day delivery. While waiting for the powerline modems to arrive, I drove over to the local Harbor Freight store in Washington City and bought a Circuit Detective for about $21. This tool allows you to sniff out the connections between a power outlet and the circuit breaker box. I needed to do that because powerline modems work best when the modems are plugged into outlets that are on the same leg of the 220-volt line. (This is a North America thing.) I could not tell from the labeling on the circuit breaker panel which outlets were on each side of the incoming 220-volt line.

After returning home, I pulled the Circuit Detective from the package and discovered that it needs a 9-volt battery. Having none in stock, I scavenged one from a “free” Harbor Freight DMM that I retrieved from a box of similar meters. Over time, I have collected quite a few of these DMMs when Harbor Freight used to give them away. Now they cost five or six bucks. They’re fine for measuring continuity and low dc voltages, but don’t stick their probes into any lethal voltages. If you do, you’ll probably be OK. Probably. Most certainly, don’t pay six bucks for one. Splurge and spend $20 or $30 on a better DMM.

The Circuit Detective told me that the outlets in the cable modem room were not on the same 220-volt leg as the outlets in the study, which meant that the TP-Link powerline modem was less likely to work. A little online research indicated that some powerline modems will work with outlets on different legs of the 220-volt circuit. It depends on the outlet locations and “other factors,” so I awaited the powerline modem’s arrival to conduct the experiment. At least the Circuit Detective told me where I stood.

My first attempt with the powerline modems failed. The TP-Link powerline modem in the server room found the one in the study and paired with it at first, but the connection broke a few minutes later. However, by moving the powerline modem in the server room about 10 feet to another outlet in the same room, the two powerline modems paired and held the connection. As my research indicated, success depends on many factors and, if one outlet doesn’t work, then try the next one.

At this point I hooked my Arris cable modem to one TP-Link powerline modem using an Ethernet cable and connected my laptop to the powerline modem in the study with another Ethernet cable. I had successfully established a virtual Ethernet connection over the house wiring system from cable modem to PC. What remained was to test the connection with an Internet speed test.

The results were both good and disappointing. They were good because I got the speed test to work. However, the tests showed that I was not getting any more bandwidth from the powerline modem than I was getting through the 5 GHz WiFi. I cannot tell from the results whether this is the cable modem’s fault, the powerline modem’s fault, or my fault, but the conclusion is the same. Based on these test results, the powerline modem went back to Amazon. Eventually, I might try a mesh router system for my house, but for now, WiFi will do.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
May 24, 2024
Could these creepy crawly robo-critters be the first step on a slippery road to a robot uprising coupled with an insect uprising?...
May 23, 2024
We're investing in semiconductor workforce development programs in Latin America, including government and academic partnerships to foster engineering talent.The post Building the Semiconductor Workforce in Latin America appeared first on Chip Design....

featured video

Why Wiwynn Energy-Optimized Data Center IT Solutions Use Cadence Optimality Explorer

Sponsored by Cadence Design Systems

In the AI era, as the signal-data rate increases, the signal integrity challenges in server designs also increase. Wiwynn provides hyperscale data centers with innovative cloud IT infrastructure, bringing the best total cost of ownership (TCO), energy, and energy-itemized IT solutions from the cloud to the edge.

Learn more about how Wiwynn is developing a new methodology for PCB designs with Cadence’s Optimality Intelligent System Explorer and Clarity 3D Solver.

featured paper

Altera® FPGAs and SoCs with FPGA AI Suite and OpenVINO™ Toolkit Drive Embedded/Edge AI/Machine Learning Applications

Sponsored by Intel

Describes the emerging use cases of FPGA-based AI inference in edge and custom AI applications, and software and hardware solutions for edge FPGA AI.

Click here to read more

featured chalk talk

Data Connectivity at Phoenix Contact
Single pair ethernet provides a host of benefits that can enable seamless data communication for a variety of different applications. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton and Guadalupe Chalas from Phoenix Contact explore the role that data connectivity will play for the future of an all electric society, the benefits that single pair ethernet brings to IIoT designs and how Phoenix Contact is furthering innovation in this arena.
Jan 5, 2024
19,565 views