feature article
Subscribe Now

I Are An Embedded Engineer

“So… what is it you do, again?”

How many times have you been asked that question? How many times explaining your career choice to family and friends? To impress your date with your mad job skills? To fill out a simple form, straining for words that will fit in the box labeled “profession?”

About halfway into the conversation do most people hear, “computer engineer” and ask you to fix their PC? This must be what it’s like being a doctor at a cocktail party. Every casual conversation quickly devolves into a plea for free technical support. “It does this funny thing when I click the thing.” Either that or they ask you for investment advice on Intel stock, Microsoft, or Google. You must know everyone at Google, right? Can you get them to fix image search? It sucks now.

In reality, we’re embedded engineers. Developers of things that aren’t PCs. Users of operating systems they don’t stock at Best Buy; creators of applications you can’t download from the App Store for $0.99. And no, I can’t fix your frickin’ PC.

Statistically speaking, virtually all electronics engineering is embedded engineering. After all, how many people really design PCs and Macs? Maybe ten companies, and maybe 20-40 guys in each of those companies? That’s a pretty small job pool, and besides, what do those guys have to think about, anyway? You just plug in the latest Intel or AMD processor, the latest core-logic chipset, and the latest graphics controller. How hard can it be? To paraphrase Truman Capote, that’s not designing, that’s typing. If you can put Tab A in Slot B you can design a PC.

No, real engineers develop embedded systems. So why don’t people at large—and our in-laws in particular—understand that? They hear “electronics” and instantly think “PC.”

Even amongst ourselves, there’s disagreement over what constitutes an embedded system. Personally, I’ve always defined it as anything that isn’t a computer. I know, that’s an inherently exclusionary definition; it’s a bit like defining the population of the world as “people who aren’t astronauts.” It’s also intrinsically vague: what constitutes a computer, so we know what not to include? Well, let’s see… a Windows PC is a computer, a Mac is a computer, a Linux box might be a computer, and, uh, after that I don’t know…

Like the judicial definition of pornography, we know it when we see it.

Which doesn’t leave us with much to talk about with our friends. “I don’t make PCs” isn’t much of a job description. “I don’t make porn” or “I’m not an astronaut” would be as useful.

Is an iPhone a computer or an embedded system? How about a PlayStation 3 or the navigation system in your car? These all seem like embedded systems (to me, at least), yet they’ve all got more CPU horsepower, RAM, and nonvolatile storage than the first dozen “real computers” I worked on. They even have keyboards, high-resolution displays, and network interfaces, the razor blade by which one could formerly separate the computers from the embedded systems.

They all have operating systems, too, and run multiple applications at once. And they crash—surely a sign of computer-hood.

So what does separate embedded systems from PCs? Performance level? Resources? Consumer acceptance (if it’s awkward to use, it’s a computer; otherwise it’s an embedded system)?

A colleague of mine once defined embedded systems as “closed” boxes that didn’t accept third-party software. Embedded systems, he felt, always shipped with all the software they’d ever have. There might be the occasional factory upgrade of the firmware, but nobody would install apps or run programs.

Another coworker sniffed that embedded systems were reliable, as opposed to computers, which require constant maintenance. Naturally, any time his prototypes failed in the lab we dealt him the ultimate insult by calling them PCs.

Finally, some insist that embedded systems are always hidden and usually invisible. They’re “embedded,” after all; implanted inside some other product. That makes sense and it’s even lexicographically correct, but what happens when there is no outer-wrapper product and the embedded technology is all there is? The electronics inside a missile is clearly embedded; the electronics in a PlayStation is the whole product.

So in the end we wind up describing our current projects. “I’m working on a new network router” or “I work for Cisco” is about as accurate as it gets. Never mind that two years ago you were designing robot controllers, and two years before that writing firmware for animated toys. In short, you’re an embedded designer.

What do you think is the definition of an embedded system, and how do you describe your career to the unwashed? Fill up our forum pages. I’d be interested in what works (and what doesn’t) in getting the point across.

In the meantime, I gotta go backup my phone’s applications before the next OS upgrade. 

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Nov 30, 2021
We live in a world where the idea of usability is to make products easy to use, make things easily accessible, and visually appealing. It's our constant endeavor to improve the usability of our... [[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community si...
Nov 29, 2021
Tell me if you've heard this before, but I'm looking for a Nordic word that has a sufficiently amorphous gestalt to make it confusing to explain in Norwegian....
Nov 29, 2021
Lean how virtual electronic control units (ECUs) accelerate automotive design and enable advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) for connected vehicles. The post From Road to PC: Accelerating Intelligent Software Growth with Virtual ECUs appeared first on From Silicon To S...
Nov 8, 2021
Intel® FPGA Technology Day (IFTD) is a free four-day event that will be hosted virtually across the globe in North America, China, Japan, EMEA, and Asia Pacific from December 6-9, 2021. The theme of IFTD 2021 is 'Accelerating a Smart and Connected World.' This virtual event ...

featured video

Integrity 3D-IC: Industry’s First Fully Integrated 3D-IC Platform

Sponsored by Cadence Design Systems

3D stacking of ICs is emerging as a preferred solution for chip designers facing a slowdown in Moore’s Law and the rising costs of advanced nodes. However, chip stacking creates new complexities, with extra considerations required for the mechanical, electrical, and thermal aspects of the whole stacked system. Watch this video for an overview of Cadence® Integrity™ 3D-IC, a comprehensive platform for 3D planning, implementation, and system analysis, enabling system-driven PPA for multi-chiplet designs.

Click here for more information

featured paper

4 questions to ask before choosing a Wi-SUN stack

Sponsored by Texas Instruments

Scalability, reliability, security, and speed—these are the advantages that the Wireless Smart Ubiquitous Network (Wi-SUN®) offers to smart cities and the Internet of Things. But as a developer, how can you maximize these advantages in your software design? In this article, TI addresses four questions to help you save development cost and get to market faster with a more streamlined design cycle for your IoT application.

Click to read more

featured chalk talk

IEC 62368-1 Overvoltage Requirements

Sponsored by Mouser Electronics and Littelfuse

Over-voltage protection is an often neglected and misunderstood part of system design. But often, otherwise well-engineered devices are brought down by over-voltage events. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Todd Phillips of Littelfuse about the new IEC 623689-1 standard, what tests are included in the standard, and how the standard allows for greater safety and design flexibility.

Click here for more information about Littelfuse IEC 62368-1 Products