editor's blog
Subscribe Now

Wireless Power: Making Actual Product

2014-11-17_10_15_45-PowerSquare.png

Things have been a bit quiet on the wireless power front, but occasionally I’ll become aware of a new player and will dig in to find out how they work. In particular, given that there are now two main competing resonant (e-field) charging standards, it’s interesting to learn where the various players stand.

As a quick review, the two standards are Qi, at a lower frequency (200 kHz) building off of its existing inductive charging market, and Rezence, at a higher frequency (6.78 MHz), which is a newcomer.

The latest company I ran across was PowerSquare, who announced their technology this past summer. These guys help illustrate how this market is playing out. Some companies, like WiTricity, are firmly allied with a standard (in their case,

Rezence). They develop the basic technology and then license it to companies building actual charging stations. Most of the companies and standards groups I’ve talked with in the past were of this variety.

PowerSquare is not: they’re in the next tier of companies trying to establish a retail brand. As such, their focus isn’t on evangelizing one or another technology; their focus is on selling chargers. So PowerSquare isn’t allied with one or the other approach; they’re going to use what’s available and what works and what’s cost effective.

In this case, their current products leverage the Qi standard. Why? Because that’s what’s there now. In fact, they’re not even doing the newer e-field resonant thing – that’s not ready yet (or wasn’t when they assembled their product). So they use the old inductive (m-field-oriented) approach.

They have, however, adopted some of the techniques we’ve discussed before, creating a pad with an array of coils so that you can put a phone anywhere on it or charge multiple phones at once. So, while they get “x” and “y” positioning flexibility, what they don’t get with that approach is increased “z” spacing: the phone still has to be on the pad, close to the coils. You can’t mount the pad under a table or counter – the resonant approach would be needed for that.

Looking forward, PowerSquare CEO Pavan Pudipeddi sees plusses and minuses for both evolving standards. The biggest thing Qi has going for it is momentum: its legacy helps propel it forward. They already have working technology, albeit inductive, so, even though they’re getting their resonant approach squared away, there’s less pressure because they’ve already got something to sell.

That legacy is also a challenge for Qi, because they’re all about backward-compatibility. So decisions from the past affect the future; that could feel like baggage at some point.

Rezence, on the other hand, has in its favor support from some heavy-hitting companies: Intel, Samsung, and Qualcomm among them. Their challenge is that this technology is new, and there’s intense pressure to get product out the door to establish some traction. In particular, Mr. Pudipeddi wasn’t aware of any uptake of the Rezence technology in phone designs as of when we spoke. (That could have changed by now.)

The first Rezence-based product is expected by the end of the year, however, so the battle will be fully joined at that point. And PowerSquare will continue to use whichever versions of whichever technology hold the most promise for selling units at the retail level.

You can read PowerSquare’s technology announcement here.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Sep 26, 2021
https://youtu.be/Ivi2dTIcm9E Made at my garden gate (camera Carey Guo) Monday: Ten Lessons from Three Generations of Google TPUs Tuesday: At a Digital Crossroads Wednesday: Announcing Helium, Hybrid... [[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community si...
Sep 24, 2021
Wi-Fi, NB-IoT, Bluetooth, LoRaWAN... This webinar will help you to choose the appropriate connectivity protocol for your IoT application....
Sep 23, 2021
The GIRLS GO Engineering scholarship provides opportunities for women in tech and fosters diversity in STEM; see the winners of our 2021 engineering challenge! The post GIRLS GO Engineering! Empowers Our Next-Gen Women in Tech appeared first on From Silicon To Software....
Sep 23, 2021
The Global Environment Facility Small Grants Programme (GEF SGP), implemented by the United Nations Development Programme, is collaborating with the InnovateFPGA contest. Showcase your  skills with Intel Edge-Centric FPGAs and help develop technical solutions that reduce env...

featured video

Enter the InnovateFPGA Design Contest to Solve Real-World Sustainability Problems

Sponsored by Intel

The Global Environment Facility Small Grants Programme (GEF SGP), implemented by the United Nations Development Programme, is collaborating with the InnovateFPGA contest to support 7 funded projects that are looking for technical solutions in biodiversity, sustainable agriculture, and marine conservation. Contestants have access to the Intel® Cyclone® V SoC FPGA in the Cloud Connectivity Kit, Analog Devices plug-in boards, and Microsoft Azure IoT.

Learn more about the contest and enter here by October 31, 2021

featured paper

Choose a high CMTI gate driver that cuts your SiC switch dead-time

Sponsored by Maxim Integrated (now part of Analog Devices)

As GaN and SiC FETs begin to replace MOSFET and IGBT technologies in power switching applications, this Maxim paper discusses the key considerations when selecting an isolated gate driver. The paper explains the importance of CMTI and propagation delay skew and presents an isolated gate driver IC ideal for use with these new power transistors.

Click to read more

featured chalk talk

Accelerating Physical Verification Productivity Part Two

Sponsored by Synopsys

Physical verification of IC designs at today’s advanced process nodes requires an immense amount of processing power. But, getting your design and verification tools to take full advantage of the compute resources available can be a challenge. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Manoz Palaparthi of Synopsys about dramatically improving the performance of your physical verification process. 

Click here for more information about Physical Verification using IC Validator