editor's blog
Subscribe Now

Software Development is Failing

I wanted to share this, which I found on the System Safety Mailing list: https://lists.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman/listinfo/systemsafety

Martyn Thomas has enormous experience in implementing computer systems and was the founder of Praxis a company, now part of the Altran group, that became “internationally recognised as a leader in the use of rigorous software engineering, including mathematically formal methods.” He wrote in a thread about software:

I recall a lecture given by Dijkstra in 1973. A member of the audience asked “do your methods work on real world problems?” Dijkstra paused, and then said quietly “real world problems. Ah yes, those that remain when you have failed to apply all the known solutions”.
Over the years, I have heard many excuses for failures to use professional engineering methods.
“if we train the programmers, they’ll leave for a better paid job”
“we can’t hire programmers who are willing to use that programming language”
“universities don’t teach (maths, project management, quality control, planning, team working … …)”
“the customer insists that we use this (buggy) middleware for compatibility”
“modern software isn’t written – it’s assembled from lots of (buggy) COTS”
“if we try to include that in the standard, industry will revolt.”
“if we were to ask for that evidence, industry would charge us a fortune”
… and many many more.
Most software developers appear to have lost sight of the problem. Every week, I hear someone use the verb “test” when what they mean is “gain assurance that  … is fit for purpose”; this reveals a dangerous, implicit assumption that “test-and-fix” is the only practical way to develop software. Most software is still written in languages without good data structures and strong type-checking. Most software requirements (and even interface specifications) are written in English (or another natural language) – perhaps with some diagrams that lack any rigorous semantics. Most projects have grossly inadequate change control. I rarely see a risk register that is worth anything (except as a demonstration that the project manager isn’t managing the project).
Is there another trade that (a) builds complex, novel and critical systems using poorly-qualified staff, (b) almost exclusively uses tools that have major known defects, (c) builds systems from components of unknown provenance that cannot be shown to be fit for purpose and (d) nevertheless claims to be professional engineers?
Surely it is self-evident that the current state of our profession is unsustainable. Let’s stop making excuses and look for ways to accelerate the changes that we know are needed.

Martyn, it seems to me, is putting forward a very accurate view of the whole software arena. Even in the safety-critical arena there is still too little concern for these issues. How do we go about resolving this? Or is it too late to push the genii back into the bottle?

One thought on “Software Development is Failing”

  1. After all the stringent methods are applied, one is left with a complex system that at times tries to defeat itself, due to competition for resources. Worker functions are suspended during management functions, which depend upon the same faculties for interpretation and execution. Time to space translation on input and space to time for useful output. The disclaimer shipped with most software tells the truth: buyer beware.

    There is a remedy, an alternative to TMs that is in and for the time domain vs being relegated to the space domain.

    Details on request c.moeller@ieee.org

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Jul 3, 2020
[From the last episode: We looked at CNNs for vision as well as other neural networks for other applications.] We'€™re going to take a quick detour into math today. For those of you that have done advanced math, this may be a review, or it might even seem to be talking down...
Jul 2, 2020
Using the bitwise operators in general, and employing them to perform masking operations in particular, can be extremely efficacious....
Jul 2, 2020
In June, we continued to upgrade several key pieces of content across the website, including more interactive product explorers on several pages and a homepage refresh. We also made a significant update to our product pages which allows logged-in users to see customer-specifi...

Featured Video

Product Update: DesignWare® Foundation IP

Sponsored by Synopsys

Join Prasad Saggurti for an update on Synopsys’ DesignWare Foundation IP, including the world’s fastest TCAMs, widest-voltage GPIOs, I2C & I3C IOs, and LVDS IOs. Synopsys Foundation IP is silicon-proven in 7nm in more than 500,000 customer wafers, and 5nm is in development.

Click here for more information about DesignWare Foundation IP: Embedded Memories, Logic Libraries & GPIO

Featured Paper

Cryptography: How It Helps in Our Digital World

Sponsored by Maxim Integrated

Gain a basic understanding of how cryptography works and how cryptography can help you protect your designs from security threats.

Click here to download the whitepaper

Featured Chalk Talk

Meeting the Power Challenges of Today's Modern Rail

Sponsored by Mouser Electronics and Vicor

Designing for modern rail systems demands modern power supply technology. In today’s market, power density, efficiency, and reliability are paramount engineering considerations, and that starts with the way you power your components. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Michael Schipani of Vicor about choosing the right power strategy for your next modern rail design project.

Click here for more information about Vicor DCM ChiP DC-DC Converter Modules