editor's blog
Subscribe Now

Concurrent Sign-off Analysis

I’m getting a sense that we’re back into the small-company-friendly phase of the EDA company cycle. A number of newcomers (which means they’ve been around working quietly for several years and are now launching) are knocking on doors.

Invarian is one such company, and they’ve launched two analysis platforms: their “InVar Pioneer Power Platform”, with power, IR-drop/EM, and thermal analysis, and their “InVar 3D Frontier Platform” for thermal analysis of 3D ICs.

Their claim to fame is that they’re the only tool that can handle true full-chip sign-off analysis at 28 nm and below, with SPICE accuracy and fast run times (“fast” being a relative term). In particular, for digital designs, they do concurrent analysis of timing, thermal, EM/IR, and power. Yeah, they have a timing engine – and they say it’s really good, too. But trying to displace PrimeTime as the gold standard is a tough call; that’s not their goal. So the timing engine serves the other pieces.

The whole concurrent thing means that, instead of running one analysis to completion and then handing those results to the next engine for different analysis, they run the engines together. As they iterate towards convergence, they update a common database on each cycle, so each engine is using a slightly-more-converged value from the other engines on every new cycle. They say that this speeds overall convergence, taking analysis that used to require several days to run and managing it in a few hours instead, with no loss of accuracy.

Of course, having a new tool also means that you can build in parallelism from the get-go, leveraging multicore and multi-machine computing resources.

For analog sign-off, they can do co-simulation with the usual SPICE suspects. And for 3D analysis for packages with multiple dice, they boast models that are more accurate and realistic than the standard JEDEC models. And they claim greater ease of use, making rules (which are constantly evolving) more manageable in particular.

You can find more in their release.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Jan 20, 2020
As you probably know, discrete wire component data is quite a bit different than just standard socket and terminal mating relationships. When we look at how Samtec approaches discrete wire products, there are several components involved. We not only sell the assemblies, but w...
Jan 20, 2020
My latest video blog is now available. This time I am looking at operating systems for embedded applications and how you go about selecting one. You can see the video here or here: Future video blogs will continue to look at topics of interest to embedded software developers....
Jan 17, 2020
I once met Steve Wozniak, or he once met me (it's hard to remember the nitty-gritty details)....
Jan 17, 2020
[From the last episode: We saw how virtual memory helps resolve the differences between where a compiler thinks things will go in memory and the real memories in a real system.] We'€™ve talked a lot about memory '€“ different kinds of memory, cache memory, heap memory, vi...

Featured Video

RedFit IDC SKEDD Connector

Sponsored by Wurth Electronics and Mouser Electronics

Why attach a header connector to your PCB when you really don’t need one? If you’re plugging a ribbon cable into your board, particularly for a limited-use function such as provisioning, diagnostics, or testing, it can be costly and clunky to add a header connector to your BOM, and introduce yet another component to pick and place. Wouldn’t it be great if you could plug directly into your board with no connector required on the PCB side? In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Ben Arden from Wurth Electronics about Redfit, a slick new connector solution that plugs directly into standard via holes on your PCB.

Click here for more information about Wurth Electronics REDFIT IDC SKEDD Connector