editor's blog
Subscribe Now

Constraining Big Designs

It’s been a while since we took a look at timing constraints (and, in particular, their exceptions). In fact, the exceptions are where things often go wrong. Yes, a constraint may be placed, for example, on the wrong phase of the clock. Presumably, there are plenty of ways to get actual constraints wrong. But exceptions, well, they’re not quite as intuitive.

–          You might think a particular path should be an exception – when, in fact, it matters.

–          You might place an exception on a path that would have been ignored already by the tool for other reasons.

–          You might place several exceptions without realizing that they end up being redundant.

These last couple are particularly pernicious in that they clutter the design with unneeded constraints, slowing things down.

And performance is already an issue what with the size of today’s designs.

This is what Ausdia has set out to address with their new Timevision constraint automation tool. They say that they can generate and verify constraints for an entire SoC either at the RTL level (preferably) or at the gate level (for that unfortunate ECO).

The goal is to improve static timing analysis (STA) by improving the quality of constraints, and doing that in an automatic fashion. But they actually incorporate an STA engine into their own tool, so performance is critical for them as well. They claim faster speed than current solutions based on a couple of angles:

–          They use multi-threading, which gets them close to linear improvement. This brings them 5-15x performance (presumably with up to 16 cores).

–          They also talk about other optimizations… well, they talk about the fact that they exist, but… they don’t actually talk about them because they’re secret. These get them to the 50-100x performance improvement range.

They claim to have had success on designs with as many as 150 million instances and over 5000 clocks, on technologies from 90 nm down to 28 nm.

You can find out more in their release.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Jul 10, 2020
[From the last episode: We looked at the convolution that defines the CNNs that are so popular for machine vision applications.] This week we'€™re going to do some more math, although, in this case, it won'€™t be as obscure and bizarre as convolution '€“ and yet we will...
Jul 10, 2020
I need a problem that lends itself to being solved using a genetic algorithm; also, one whose evolving results can be displayed on my 12 x 12 ping pong ball array....
Jul 9, 2020
It happens all the time. We'€™re online with a designer and we'€™re looking at a connector in our picture search. He says '€œI need a connector that looks just like this one, but '€¦'€ and then he goes on to explain something he needs that'€™s unique to his desig...

featured video

Product Update: Protect IoT SoCs with DesignWare OTP NVM IP

Sponsored by Synopsys

Join Krishna Balachandran in this discussion on Synopsys DesignWare OTP NVM IP, including security, performance, power, and cost considerations. With more than 12 years of development and deployment by 500+ customers, Synopsys is the leader in antifuse-based OTP NVM IP.

Click here for more information about Synopsys DesignWare OTP NVM IP

Featured Chalk Talk

Demystifying Wireless! Key Considerations for Adding Wireless to Your IoT Solution

Sponsored by Mouser Electronics and Digi

Adding wireless connectivity to your IoT design can be a major challenge in an already-crowded schedule. And, doing it as an afterthought can cause all kinds of trouble. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Andrew Reiter from Digi International about a holistic approach to designing wireless connected designs.

Click here for more information about Digi International XBee® XBIB-C Development Boards