feature article
Subscribe Now

Safety ‘n’ Security

The Next Big Thing?

The scene: A hotel breakfast room. There are several groups, mostly of men wearing the same logo-marked polo shirt, or matching ties, speaking English and having breakfast. Out of one group comes, “Their BIOS was rubbish, so we had to write a completely new one.”  Welcome to Nuremberg during embedded world.

For three days all the hotels are packed, despite having doubled their room rates. The U-Bahn (Metro) adds extra services from the city centre to the Exhibition site, and over 900 exhibitors are visited by more than 20,000 people. Amongst them are the editors, rushing around to their long list of press conferences and press briefings.  During three days I spoke to around 4% of the exhibitors in formal meetings and a few more in informal sessions. I also received many, many press releases associated with products being launched at the show. (As I write, my inbox is being flooded with Mobile World Congress releases – in fact, so many, they are even overtaking the spam.) What follows is my attempt to capture the main trends in embedded systems based on those meetings and on the way in which companies were branding their booths.

This year, as you might expect, the emphasis of many companies was again on “The Internet of Things”, with forecasts of tens of billions of devices by 2020 or some other arbitrary time. However, frequently linked with IoT was a new word – safety’n’security.

As with the IoT, exactly what safety’n’security means depends on whom you talk to.

If it is a discussion just within the IoT, it is the realisation that, as soon as you start communicating data over wireless, there is a range of things that can go wrong, including data corruption and data interception, as well as other hacking activities. The problem is that there is already an installed base of M2M-type products that were developed without safety’n’security being considered. Other things, like medical devices, were also developed without thought for hazards – after all, who would want to hack a heart pacemaker that was set up so that it could be adjusted through a Bluetooth signal?

Outside the IoT (if you can be), then we start to move into the realms of safety-critical and high integrity systems; defence, aerospace, automotive, other transportation, process control in nuclear and chemical industries, and so on. There has been a lot of work on developing standards in these areas, but even so, there is still massive debate about what it is reasonable to expect to achieve (let alone the human ability to find ways around even the most stringent of controls, usually for what appear to be entirely sensible reasons.)

Software tools vendors were present in force. They generally reported an increasing recognition of the value of tools – not just for developing safety’n’security projects, but for broader applications, as managers are moving away from their feeling that software was just coding and begin to realise the value of a proper process and appropriate tools in improving development time and quality. These range from requirements specification through code analysis and testing and debugging. All the vendors I spoke to stress that there is a need, not just for isolated tools, but also for a robust process to be in place.

Of course, not all software is developed in-house; there is no point in re-inventing the wheel when you need, say, a TCP/IP stack or a file management system. But these need to be developed to at least the same quality level as the rest of your software, and we are increasingly seeing software vendors certifying their products. HCC Embedded, which provides software stacks and file systems (and also talked about the need for process and tools), were announcing that MISRA C compliance has been extended from their TCP/IP stack to include HTTP, SMTP, SNTP/NTP, and SNMP protocols. They also have security options to work with their encryption manager- safety’n’security again.

Another new-to-me company is Somnium. They are working on “device-aware resequencing” tools. These use knowledge of the target device to optimise the software to make the best use of memory, etc. So far, the tool is available only for Freescale Kinetis, but other targets are planned.

Even with a process in place, there will still be a need for a debugger, and two new names (to me) were at the show: Undo and PLS. Undo has developed what it calls “reversible debugging” tools for C and C++ running on Linux and Android. This records the program’s execution, along with other information, and lets you roll back to find where things started to run in an unplanned way. PLS has its Universal Debug Engine, aimed at developers working with multicore devices.

Sysgo, part of the aerospace and defence company, Thales, sells the PikeOS, a Hypervisor system with separate OS domains. They announced a hook-up with Kaspersky Labs, best known as an anti-virus company. The result is that Kaspersky’s clever algorithms will monitor traffic between the different domains, looking to make sure that only legal traffic is passing. Interesting that a French-owned company is using technology from a Russian-owned company for tools for ultra-sensitive applications.

As always, there were new processor chip announcements. Two threads were interesting: low power and radio integration. Silicon Labs, who have always been a leader in low power, combined both with their Blue Gecko Bluetooth announcement. Putting into a single device an ARM Cortex based Gecko processor (from their acquisition of Energy Micro) and a Bluetooth Smart transceiver (from their acquisition of Bluegiga), they are positioning it as the core of IoT edge devices with low power and communication.  TI also made the same sort of claims with their SimpleLink “wireless microcontroller platform”, which again uses an ARM Cortex-M3 processor. There is a family available with a selection of wireless technologies, including Bluetooth low energy, Zigbee, proprietary network protocols, and 6LoWPAN (IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks – I had to look it up as well.) If you are a processor-node nerd, you’ll want to know that this is being manufactured in a TI-proprietary process at 65 nm.

Actually, if you are a processor-node nerd, you’ll be interested in this: Freescale announced that their next generation Kinetis, a powerful multicore beast, will be manufactured on 28nm FD-SoI. This is the first major chip company other than ST to commit to FD.

Going specifically for very low power is Austin, Texas based Ambiq micro. Their Cortex-M4F-based Apollo family uses sub-threshold technology on a standard TSMC CMOS processor to give 30 µ-amps active power and 100 n-amps in sleep mode. (How on earth do you measure 100 n-amps?) Again, the company is targeting the IoT, including wearables (Fitbit-type things plus medical applications).

Wearables are regularly cited as a target for IoT developers and also as a reason for safety’n’security. There is not really much of a problem with fitness trackers, but the same technology is being used for monitoring heart rates, blood pressure, blood-sugar, and other vital signs, often using the user’s cell phone to transmit the data to a clinician. Clearly, the information has to be transmitted both securely and without corruption.

Once it is in the clinician’s hands, there are other concerns – for example, storage in the cloud, access to third parties, and so on. Normally, one would expect techniques from within the enterprise IT environment to manage these issues, but recent thefts of credit card details and other security breaches don’t create an aura of confidence. When even NSA and GCHQ can’t keep secret things secret, what hope is there for the rest of us?

This year’s embedded world was, as always, exciting, tiring and full of lovely new toys. This year, there were no scantily-clad ladies (or at least, I didn’t see them), no foosball tables, and very few popcorn machines (last years exhibition halls were full of the scent of popcorn). There were driving simulators and two student model-car competitions, sponsored by Freescale and Renesas, and even, on one booth, a farm tractor.

If I spoke to you and you are not quoted here, please forgive me – every conversation was valuable, even one that started in the men’s room. The conversations, the demos (including the beer-mug production line), and the general air of interest, even in the breakfast room, make Nuremberg’s embedded world the go-to conference for the embedded industry.

2 thoughts on “Safety ‘n’ Security”

  1. “What hope is there for the rest of us?” Companies are increasingly outsourcing security, but it is always hard to outsource Trust. Per your reference to the companies sourcing their security solutions from different countries, every end user is going to have to maintain their own matrix of who they trust (or conversely, who to blame when things go wrong).

    As described by Schneier in ‘Liars and Outliers’, this isn’t just a question of security — it is a question of how our society is constructed. Probably not a major ‘booth topic’ at Nuremberg.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Nov 20, 2019
During ICCAD earlier in the month, there was the 2nd WOSET, which stands for Workshop on Open-Source EDA Technology. I wasn't there but Anton Klotz, who runs the Cadence Academic Network in... [[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community site. ...
Nov 18, 2019
By Srinivas Velivala – Mentor, A Siemens Business MaxLinear implemented the Calibre RealTime Digital interface for fast, iterative signoff DRC during P&R, and shaved weeks off tapeout schedules while meeting PPA targets. Learn how they did it… At the 2019 TSM...
Nov 18, 2019
Dangers of 5G. Thousands of satellites. Radio controlled birds. Smartphones spying on us. And much, much more....
Nov 15, 2019
As we seek to go faster and faster in our systems, heat grows as does the noise from the cooling fans. It is because of this heat and noise, many companies are investigating or switching to submersible cooling (liquid immersion cooling) options. Over the last few years, subme...
Nov 15, 2019
[From the last episode: we looked at how intellectual property helps designers reuse circuits.] Last week we saw that, instead of creating a new CPU, most chip designers will buy a CPU design '€“ like a blueprint of the CPU '€“ and then use that in a chip that they'€™re...