feature article
Subscribe Now

Telling Time Over Ethernet

Unless you’re in the business, you may not know there’s a serious challenge facing the cellular phone industry beyond who’s coming out with the next iPhone competitor. It’s precision time distribution. Yes, this little-known but critically-needed telecom utility has been holding back the wireless future.

The growing popularity of iPhones and other devices that support rich media and Internet browsing is adding tremendous data capacity pressure onto the already severe cost pressure that keeps wireless service providers up at night. The traditional Time Division Multiplex (TDM) lines that connect cellular Base Transceiver Stations (BTSs) to the wireline network have historically distributed the required timing along with the voice and data traffic. The trouble is, each of these lines can cost thousands of dollars to lease annually from wireline providers, so adding TDM lines to increase capacity isn’t economically viable. The obvious solution is to replace TDM lines with carrier-class Ethernet – massive reliable capacity at one-sixth the cost of TDM – which providers have been contemplating for years. But the trouble is timing: how do you distribute precision time over an asynchronous packet network like Ethernet?

Time over Packet Networks: IEEE 1588-2008 Precision Time Protocol

Telecom timing gurus and networking mavens have joined forces to solve the vexing problem of precision timing over asynchronous packet networks. The result is a new standard, called IEEE 1588-2008 Precision Time Protocol (PTP), that’s able to transfer time with microsecond-range accuracy and parts-per-billion frequency stability over miles of multi-hop Ethernet paths. For comparison, time-transfer accuracy across smaller local-area networks (LANs) can be in the nanosecond range. This is very non-intuitive, but very doable. In fact, it’s good enough to deliver the stable 16 ppb (parts per billion) long-term frequency reference and +/- 1 microsecond time reference requirements of existing 3G and emerging 4G cellular standards.

PTP is a client-server protocol in which PTP clients (also called slaves) exchange synchronization messages with PTP grandmaster clock (GMC) servers, ensuring that client time is precisely synchronized with GMC time. Stable frequency comes across as well, since you need that for stable time. The frequent exchange of messages and a sophisticated oscillator-control servo design combine to overcome the packet-delay variation inherent in asynchronous packet networks like Ethernet. Figure 1 illustrates the basic message transactions architectural building blocks of the PTP protocol.

20091208_symmetricom_fig1.jpg

1: IEEE 1588-2008 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) Messaging

PTP clients can be implemented in a variety of forms. “Translators” convert PTP to traditional time or frequency signals that allow PTP to be retrofitted into legacy backhaul systems, embedded PTP client boards, or modules that provide the cost advantage of an integrated solution without needing to become a PTP expert. Or there are fully integrated firmware/software implementations that leverage the host system’s processing power for ultimate flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

IEEE 1588-2008 Best Practices for Cellular Backhaul

Following some simple deployment guidelines helps to ensure the best results for Ethernet cellular backhaul timing applications. Figure 2 shows a simplified application view.

20091208_symmetricom_fig2.jpg

2: Ethernet Cellular Backhaul Timing

The most important decision is selecting PTP GMCs and clients designed to operate in a telecom environment, including “carrier-class” products with appropriate performance, reliability, monitoring and management capability, warranty, and support. Hardware time-stamping on both GMC and client ends is imperative to achieve the required stability. Good quality GMC, client-oscillator, and servo (frequency control) quality will make or break performance under challenging and network conditions, including outages. PTP supports a range of timing message update rates. GMCs and clients with the ability to update as often as 128 times per second help significantly with highly dynamic traffic levels and network packet delay variation (PDV) characteristics as well as path reroutes.

Several factors contribute to effective Ethernet backhaul timing network design. GMC serving capacity and the number and type of network elements between GMC and PTP clients are the primary concerns in selecting PTP GMC deployment locations. GMC capacity needs to support the sum of the message update rates for all assigned clients. Measurements of a variety of carrier-class network cascades under various traffic conditions have led to excellent results with PTP networks up to ten hops. PTP supports alternate or backup GMCs, so planning for potential GMC outages by ensuring that backup GMCs have the capacity to support their clients will ensure carrier-class reliability. Remote monitoring and management capability in GMCs and clients will keep network managers informed of timing network health and reduce operating expenses (OPEX).

PTP equipment suppliers can provide more details on PTP application best practices.

Conclusion

The cellular phone industry is solving its costly Base Transceiver Station (BTS) timing problem with IEEE 1588-2008 Precision Time Protocol (PTP). PTP delivers BTS frequency and time references along with voice and data traffic via Ethernet backhaul at one-sixth the cost of traditional Time Division Multiplex (TDM) solutions. Applying simple deployment guidelines ensures the best results under varying environmental and network conditions. IEEE 1588-2008 fulfills the promise of Ethernet cellular backhaul for low-cost delivery of rich media on mobile devices.

7 thoughts on “Telling Time Over Ethernet”

  1. Pingback: binaural
  2. Pingback: friv
  3. Pingback: diy kids treehouse

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Apr 11, 2021
https://youtu.be/D29rGqkkf80 Made in "Hawaii" (camera Ziyue Zhang) Monday: Dynamic Duo 2: The Sequel Tuesday: Gall's Law and Big Ball of Mud Wednesday: Benedict Evans on Tech in 2021... [[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community sit...
Apr 8, 2021
We all know the widespread havoc that Covid-19 wreaked in 2020. While the electronics industry in general, and connectors in particular, took an initial hit, the industry rebounded in the second half of 2020 and is rolling into 2021. Travel came to an almost stand-still in 20...
Apr 7, 2021
We explore how EDA tools enable hyper-convergent IC designs, supporting the PPA and yield targets required by advanced 3DICs and SoCs used in AI and HPC. The post Why Hyper-Convergent Chip Designs Call for a New Approach to Circuit Simulation appeared first on From Silicon T...
Apr 5, 2021
Back in November 2019, just a few short months before we all began an enforced… The post Collaboration and innovation thrive on diversity appeared first on Design with Calibre....

featured video

Meeting Cloud Data Bandwidth Requirements with HPC IP

Sponsored by Synopsys

As people continue to work remotely, demands on cloud data centers have never been higher. Chip designers for high-performance computing (HPC) SoCs are looking to new and innovative IP to meet their bandwidth, capacity, and security needs.

Click here for more information

featured paper

Understanding Functional Safety FIT Base Failure Rate Estimates per IEC 62380 and SN 29500

Sponsored by Texas Instruments

Functional safety standards such as IEC 61508 and ISO 26262 require semiconductor device manufacturers to address both systematic and random hardware failures. Base failure rates (BFR) quantify the intrinsic reliability of the semiconductor component while operating under normal environmental conditions. Download our white paper which focuses on two widely accepted techniques to estimate the BFR for semiconductor components; estimates per IEC Technical Report 62380 and SN 29500 respectively.

Click here to download the whitepaper

featured chalk talk

In-Chip Sensing and PVT Monitoring

Sponsored by Synopsys

In-chip monitoring can significantly alter the lifecycle management landscape. By taking advantage of modern techniques, today’s more complex designs can be optimized even after they are deployed. In this episode of Chalk Talk, Amelia Dalton chats with Stephen Crosher of Synopsys about silicon lifecycle management and how to take full advantage of the optimization opportunities available for scalability, reliability, and much more.

Click here for more information about in-chip monitoring and sensing