posted by Jim Turley
This is what $32 billion gets you: Almost the whole world. UK-based ARM announced last night that it has agreed to be acquired by Tokyo-based SoftBank, a large holding company that owns many technology firms as well as some technical publications. It's also the majority shareholder in U.S. celluar carrier Sprint. It's fair to say that SoftBank's holdings are wide-ranging.
What does this mean for ARM, ARM's employees, and ARM's customers?
Not much, really. Under the terms of the deal, SoftBank said many reassuring things. It will keep ARM's headquarters in Cambridge, where it's been since the very beginning; it will retain ARM's management structure; and it will hire several thousand more employees in the UK. In fact, SoftBank committed to doubling ARM's UK headcount, which is a remarkable commitment given that the company already employs over 3,000 people among its varous UK offices. It's taken ARM almost 20 years to get to that headcount; SoftBank says it will double it in another five. No doubt the hiring guarantee will make the takeover more politically palatable.
The terms of the deal were quite favorable to ARM. SoftBank is offering about USD $32 billion, all in cash, which is a generous 43% premium over ARM's current stock price. It's also a huge 50x to 70x P:E ratio (price to earnings), putting ARM into Facebook territory as far as market valuation and optimism goes. Clearly, SoftBank is quite bullish on ARM's prospects.
On the flip side, the UK Pound has steadily declined in value versus the Japanese Yen, making the price easier for SoftBank to swallow. Compared to a year ago, the ratio has slipped by about one-third as "Brexit" concerns have weighed on the UK economy. Thus, the 43% premium for ARM's shares isn't as painful for the Japanese company as it might have been.
Even so, these negotiations have certainly been in the works for some time, and must have been agreed in principle before the outcome of the "Brexit" vote was known. The acquisition would have likely gone ahead regardless of the vote. The financial terms might have changed, but the deal likely would have gone forward either way.
I've participated in a few acquisitions, both as acquirer and as acquiree. Coincidentally, one of my employers was even acquired by SoftBank many years ago. I met Masayohi Son, the founder and CEO of SoftBank, and we spoke briefly about his plans and strategy. Even 15 years later, I remember him as a remarkable man (with very good English), who said that he liked to own "infrastructure." He talked about the California Gold Rush and how it wasn't the gold miners who got rich, but the people who supplied them: Levi Strauss and his blue jeans; Leland Stanford and Charles Crocker and their railroad, and so on. "Infrastructure," he said, "is the most exciting kind of technology." His acquisition of ARM would seem to fit right into that strategy.
Once ARM is Japanese-owned, I wouldn't expect much to change. In my experience, SoftBank doesn't make big changes to the companies it acquires. Son-san prefers to simply skim some cash from his profitable ventures, not micro-manage them. His obligation to double the headcount in the UK is likely a political maneuver designed to ease government approval of the deal and to calm concerned employees. It's hard to tell what ARM would do with another 3,000 or so new employees, but they've got five years to figure that out. Every employee who's there today can look forward to having a new partner soon.
Before last night's deal was announced, there had been talk that another company might acquire ARM, perhaps Intel or Apple. Both possibilities made good strategic sense, but now those rumors can be put to rest. ARM is now out of reach -- unless SoftBank chooses to resell its newest prize. That's very unlikely, at least for the next five or ten years.
SoftBank isn't likely to exert any kind of technical pressure on ARM. The CPU architecture isn't suddenly going to change, nor is the company's business model about to be overturned. I would expect business as usual at ARM, and for its licensees and developers, for the foreseeable future. Only the financial reporting structure changes. For everyone else, it's business as usual.
posted by Dick Selwood
Imec, the Belgian research centre for nanoelectronics has an annual programme of Technology Forums. (Fora?) The European Flagship Forum is scheduled for the end of May and will be in Brussels.
With the theme, "Daring to Take a Different View—Nanotechnology in the Hot Seat,” the programme covers a wide range of topics, as you can expect from imec, with speakers from the top levels of a range of companies including, among others, Samsung, Mentor Graphics, ASM International, Infineon Technologies, GlobalFoundries, J&J Pharmaceuticals, Audi, Microsoft and imec itself. There are panel sessions and this year there is a new innovation - "Hot Seats" - where imec experts answer audience questions on a range of topics.
But as well as technology, there is another message, which I interpret as "Brussels is remaining in business." I expect to see increased numbers of security people on the streets and in the Metro. But I, and I expect a significant number of others will be there to show solidarity as well as to hear technology. See you in Brussels?
posted by Kevin Morris
We understand why many people have turned to ad blockers these days. With the proliferation of websites that create miserable browsing experiences, we’re sometimes tempted to install blockers ourselves.
However, we’d like you to please consider whitelisting EEJournal.com if you use an ad blocker.
EEJournal.com is 100% advertising supported. Without ad revenue, we would not be able to exist.
To Our Audience, We Promise:
In return for your trust, we promise to do our best to always give you, our valued audience, a pleasant browsing experience:
We will never run “Roadblock”, “Pop-over”, “Pop-under”, “Wallpaper”, or other annoying ad types.
We will never place ads in the middle of the article or other content you are trying to read.
We will never split our articles and other content into multiple pages so you have to click “next page”->”next page”->”next page”->”next page” in order to read the whole thing - just so we can deliver more ads.
We will work with our advertisers to do our best to deliver context-relevant ads, so that the ads you see placed tastefully near the content are actually related to the content and something you might want to know about.
We will work to preserve the cleanest, easiest browsing experience possible - with one click to just about anywhere on the site, rather than requiring a bunch of navigation through various intermediate pages (just to deliver more ads).
We will never “rent” our mailing lists to third parties. If you sign up for our email newsletters, you will get emails only from us.
We will remain steadfast in our clear separation of editorial and commercial content so you can trust our staff-written content to be unbiased and unaffected by sponsorship or commercial interests. Our editors’ charter is to serve YOU, our audience with the best-quality objective information and critical analysis available.
To our Sponsors, We Promise:
To treat your brand with respect, and avoid using your ads in ways that would annoy the customers you’re trying to attract.
To never “buy” traffic or engage in trickery to inflate ad views or clicks.
To place your ads and content marketing programs tastefully and visibly on our site and social media venues where they will engage well-qualified, interested prospects.
To report your campaign results as honestly and accurately as the technology allows.
Thank you for reading EE Journal, and we appreciate your consideration on this matter.
President - Techfocus Media, Inc.