feature article
Subscribe Now

Ambiq Apollo MCU Gets Funky With Voltage

Leveraging Physics for the Betterment of Humankind

“Reality is that which, if you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.” – Philip K. Dick

 

We all work with the same laws of physics. That’s why they’re laws, not guidelines. We deal with Ohm’s Law, Shannon’s Law, Cole’s Law (thinly sliced cabbage), and others. And one of the immutable laws of electronics is that power consumption is proportional to voltage. Raise the voltage, and you raise the power consumption, all other things being equal. And of course, that works the other way, too. Lower voltages reduce power. Very tidy.

So why, oh why, do chipmakers have such a hard time reducing the power consumption of their microprocessors, microcontrollers, DRAMs, and other devices? Just lower the voltage! Did you not attend Electronics 101? How hard can that be?

Pretty hard, as it turns out. Although voltage, wattage, power, current, and energy all behave very nicely in the theoretical realm, they’re much more recalcitrant in reality. Real semiconductor transistors don’t work on a sliding voltage/current scale. They like to switch on and off at discrete voltage levels, determined by the design of the transistor and the geometry and chemistry of the semiconductor materials. You can’t merely dial the voltage up or down and get a clean, tidy, ramp in current consumption. Set the voltage too low and the transistors fail to switch. Crank the voltage up too high and you release the magic smoke that makes all electronics work.

As it stands, most low-power transistors toggle at somewhere around 1.0V. Even though we supply the chips with 3.3V (or even 5V in some cases), the internal transistors really treat 1.8V as fully “on.” That’s a lot more power efficient than earlier 3.3V or 5V transistors. But not as efficient as they could be.

Lowering the supply voltage and/or the switching-threshold voltage sounds like a no-brainer, but implementing it is tricky. CMOS transistors don’t like voltages hovering in that big gray area between fully off and fully on. They leak current badly, and they behave erratically, acting like analog circuits (which, ultimately, they are) instead of digital switches. Sub-threshold voltage levels are a digital no-man’s land.

Unless you work at Ambiq Micro. Then it’s your bread and butter. The small (25-person) company based in Austin thrives in that off-limits zone where other CMOS transistors fear to tread. For Ambiq, 0.5V is considered high voltage. The company designs its digital transistors to switch at extremely low voltages where other transistors just leak, dither, and do weird things. Ambiq’s low-voltage party trick means they had to design all their own digital libraries, transistor models, and testing procedures – but hey, once that was out of the way, it was all smooth sailing.

Ambiq first showed off its low-voltage design expertise with an RTC (real-time clock) chip a few years ago. Like most RTCs, you supply the thing with 3.3V. But, unlike most RTCs, it consumes just a dozen or so nanoamps while it’s running. That’s a remarkably low current draw, even for an RTC. Granted, an RTC isn’t likely to be the biggest energy consumer in your system, so even the world’s most psychotically power-efficient RTC won’t make a huge difference in the overall power budget. But it did make a nice proof-of-concept for Ambiq’s technology.

This week, the company is rolling out its first microcontroller, an ARM Cortex-M4F device it calls Apollo. (Yes, another ARM-based MCU company. When will the madness end?) As such, Apollo joins other M4F-based chips from Atmel, Freescale, Infineon, NXP, Silicon Labs, Spansion, STMicroelectronics, and Texas Instruments. At first blush, all of these MCUs are roughly equivalent, with the same M4F processor core, on-chip RAM and ROM, and a plethora of I/O goodies. Most developers are likely to pick their favorite from out of this candy basket based either on the mix of peripherals or on their experience with the vendor. Did we use a Freescale MCU last time? Splendid, let’s go with them again this time.

Where Ambiq sticks out, of course, is with Apollo’s very low power consumption. How low? How does 30 µA/MHz grab you? That’s the data book spec for Apollo’s active current, and it’s almost an order of magnitude lower than the other vendors’ M4F-based parts. Freescale, for example, boasts run-time current consumption of “under 200 µA/MHz” for its Kinetis K22 device family. NXP’s LPC54100 Series consumes 100 µA/MHz, according to the company.

Perhaps the closest low-power competitor is the delightfully named Wonder Gecko chip from Silicon Labs (after its acquisition of Norwegian-based Energy Micro). Like Apollo, Wonder Gecko is based around a modestly clocked Cortex-M4F core, on-chip RAM and ROM, and the usual assortment of on-chip I/O. Silicon Labs says Wonder Gecko burns 225 µA/MHz while it’s running out of on-chip ROM, while Ambiq claims Apollo uses just 30 µA/MHz: a 7.5:1 difference. In sleep mode, the specs say 63 µA/MHz for the super lizard (and 950 nA for “deep sleep” mode), versus 100 nA/MHz for Apollo.

Of course, sleep modes are notoriously difficult to compare because they have so many different variations, details, and footnotes. No two chips’ sleep modes are directly comparable, and most chips have several different modes. Still, it’s instructive to see that each company’s best marketeering efforts still produce numbers that are off by factors of tens, if not hundreds.

The downside? In spite of its namesake, Apollo ain’t fast. The chip maxes out at a measly 24 MHz. The mighty Wonder Gecko runs twice that fast, Kinetis hits 120 MHz, and some Spansion M4F-based MCUs peak at 200 MHz (although they outrun their on-chip ROM above 72 MHz).

Still, you can’t have it all. If what you’re worried about is minimizing power consumption, then you’re probably not going to be clocking your MCU at triple-digit speeds. At least, not until we see a quantum leap in semiconductor technology or MCU design. Apollo certainly has adequate compute power for a ton of embedded and IoT applications; it does have a floating-point unit and DSP-like features, after all. It doesn’t need to be all that fast. And with prices that start at $1.50 for the small-memory configurations in big quantities, Apollo isn’t the cheapest M4F-based MCU out there, but it’s not hideously expensive, either. It’s a new MCU in a market crowded with similar MCUs, but with one very good trick up its sleeve. Let’s see how the laws of supply and demand play out for Ambiq. 

7 thoughts on “Ambiq Apollo MCU Gets Funky With Voltage”

  1. Pingback: car crash usa
  2. Pingback: bandar judi bola
  3. Pingback: slots
  4. Pingback: Stix Events
  5. Pingback: iraq Seo

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Sep 25, 2018
Samtec is releasing new digital ECAD models for over 100,000 of its products on SnapEDA, the industry-leading circuit board design library. Traditionally, designers have spent days creating digital ECAD models – such as symbols and footprints – for each component ...
Sep 25, 2018
Robots are a hot topic these days. From helping doctors in the operating room to helping survivors of a natural disaster, it'€™s clear that robots are poised to play an important role......
Sep 25, 2018
CDNLive India took place a few weeks ago and we are just trying to catch our breath! If you missed it, I'm going to be posting two cool videos before the weekend with the highlights. Here are two blogs by the veteran blogger Paul McLellan - one on Asynchronous Design and...
Sep 21, 2018
  FPGA luminary David Laws has just published a well-researched blog on the Computer History Museum'€™s Web site titled '€œWho invented the Microprocessor?'€ If you'€™re wildly waving your raised hand right now, going '€œOoo, Ooo, Ooo, Call on me!'€ to get ...