feature article
Subscribe Now

A Crossroads of Vision

Altium Alters Course

Altium has long been a standout in the EDA industry. The company got its start as Protel – a supplier of affordable desktop PCB layout solutions. When the big EDA suppliers were exclusively selling expensive, workstation-based, enterprise-level board design systems, Altium (Protel) provided a strong, usable desktop solution for everybody else – the people who didn’t have a huge design tool budget.

As Protel evolved into Altium, their differences from the pack became more pronounced. Altium became the company of vision, with the goal of supplying the masses with a comprehensive tool suite including design capture, FPGA design, embedded software development, and trusty-old board layout. They wanted to give you an affordable desktop solution that could take your product design from soup to nuts, as long as you weren’t doing custom IC design. 

Altium’s vision went beyond affordable integrated design tool solutions, though. The company saw an opportunity to take electronic product development in a new, more progressive direction. Altium developed prototyping platforms that were tightly coupled to their design software, while creating a supply chain that would allow their customers to develop a product in Altium Designer, prototype it with Altium’s development boards, do early deployment with pre-manufactured production versions of the development board, and go to volume production with pre-established supply lines.

In a controversial move, Altium packed up and moved their headquarters from Australia to Shanghai, China a couple years ago. At about the same time, the company went full-tilt into creating a comprehensive ecosystem that managed the entire product development cycle, including integration with supply-chain data so you could access pricing and availability information for components before you designed them in, and further smoothing the transition from design to manufacturing. By moving to China, the company was looking for access to a much larger pool of engineering talent and for a better connection with Chinese supply chain and customers. 

When you set out to cultivate a new business ecosystem, there are always fundamental philosophical questions to be answered. How do you stimulate growth of the system as a whole? How do you make sure that all the required components of the ecosystem are present and healthy? How do you attract participants into the system? Do you create a new set of standards, or do you rely on existing ones? Do you try to manage and tightly control the system, or do you open up the environment so people and companies can freely participate? These questions are becoming more and more common as we see an increase in the “ecosystem” model over the simple “product” or “service” model. Whether it’s IOS versus Android, Linux versus Windows versus OSX, iTunes versus everything else, or any of the other ecosystem-based technology areas, somebody had to grapple with these same issues.

Altium is no exception.

In trying to establish an ecosystem for electronic designers, the company had to face a host of these sorts of questions: Would component suppliers and distributors live in an Altium-branded ecosystem, or would they pull hooks from Altium’s infrastructure into their own environment? Would other EDA companies be welcome at the party, or would the tool flow be exclusively Altium’s? The list goes on and on.

Altium faced other dilemmas as well. While their vision for board-based electronic system design seemed years ahead of most of their competitors’, it was also often ahead of their customers. Even though Altium was selling a rich and comprehensive top-to-bottom design environment, many customers were still using it just as “good old ProTel” for simple PCB place and route. The vision sounded spectacular, but getting customers to put it into practice was a major challenge. At the same time, the company continually struggled with profitability. Revenues rose, but investment back in engineering was heavy. Investors were patient, but not to the extreme. Something had to give.

What gave was senior management. Nick Martin – founder and long-term visionary – left the company, and a re-focus was declared. Under revised leadership, Altium would open up its ecosystem, bring more balance to vision versus profitability, and increase focus on existing customers.

In order to understand these issues better, we had a chat with the executive management team, which includes long-term veterans of the company. Kayvan Oboudiyat – Altium’s CEO, Aram Mirkazemi – Altium’s CTO, and Frank Hoschar – Altium’s CMO walked us through the key principles of Altium’s revised strategy.

Altium plans to open up their DXP development platform (and their base of 80,000+ users) to other tool and IP vendors. This includes allowing other companies to write apps for delivery in the Altium ecosystem, or extending their own ecosystem using Altium’s technologies (such as those from their previous acquisition of Morfik). They plan to give both customers and partners SDK access in order to facilitate the development of their own apps. If you’re getting the idea here that Altium is going more toward the “Android” model than the “Apple IOS” model, you’d be right. The company’s goal is to provide the richest possible environment for “Smart System Design Automation” that also includes supply-chain integration and embedded device lifecycle management.

The company plans to become more “customer-centric” – meaning they will spend more energy supporting and working on solutions with existing customers, likely at the expense of work on future projects. This probably makes sense for a company like Altium that has been racing ahead of their customers for a few years. Sometimes, you need to catch your breath and work on today’s customers rather than constantly focusing on tomorrow’s. The company plans to deliver more complete and tailored solutions for specific market areas as well – driven by customer input and domain-specific requirements. 

Central to Altium’s vision and strategy is the idea that just about everything being designed these days has an element of connectivity. The “embedded internet” is with us to stay, and Altium believes that providing for that must be a fundamental capability of the design environment. Altium’s acquisition of Morfik was a keystone in that strategy, and now the company plans to proliferate that philosophy through their entire ecosystem.

Finally, the executive team said the company will be focusing more on profitability and returning value to investors. That is not-so-cryptic code for keeping expenses under control and driving new revenues as a priority. While a return to profitability was a major milestone for the company, sustained results are important to maintain the confidence of their investors, and that apparently required a change in the way the company operates. Altium’s presence and connections in China, along with their strong user base in the Americas and Europe, puts them in a unique position to bridge the gaps in the supply and service chain between China and the rest of the world. Altium appears to be uniquely positioned to capitalize on that advantage. How it plays out for customers remains to be seen.

For design teams that already depend on Altium’s tools, this all probably means you’ll see an increased focus on the “now” – helping you get the most out of the design environment you have today, and a decreased focus on the “future” – the company’s vision for how you might be designing in a couple of years. It will be interesting to watch.

6 thoughts on “A Crossroads of Vision”

  1. What do you think of Altium’s change in focus? If you use Altium tools, do you use the whole range of capabilities, or just a subset? Does the company’s vision of the design process evolution match what you see in your company?

  2. Altium may think they’ve gotten ahead of their customers with some of their new cloud initiatives, but a better explanation for the slow uptake may be that over the past five years they’ve been focused on developing services and features many of their users don’t need or want.

    Their cloud services are bundled with software maintenance, making it an all-or-nothing deal. They’ve raised the subscription price (17% this year) while returning very little in the form of meaningful feature enhancements, such as a usable autorouter, to the core product.

    Altium seems to be struggling for their place in the EDA world. I’d rather see them go narrow and deep on a few core competencies than broad and shallow on a wide array of features designed to make their product brochure look good.

  3. I invested in Altium and have been a supporter for years now. I was worried when Nick Martin – founder left and they moved to China.
    I always thought that they were trying too much in trying to be the all-in-one solution. I use Xilinx tools for Xilinx development, Altera tools for Altera, etc.

    Now if I’m reading the intent correctly: if they try an Eclipse-like formula/philosophy for allowing chip and SW venders to create plug-ins and interfaces then that might work well. You can’t compete with the chip makers tools as they know their chips best. So allowing them to write the plugin is a better plan.

    The move to China may be forward thinking and has merit, but these moves often leave great talent behind. I hope they do well as I just renewed my lic and subscriptions.

  4. I completely agree with bdc. Altium has been adding esoteric (to me) features that I certainly don’t want or need. A working autorouter and some long standing bugs in PCb fixed would be much more useful. Having said that, the latest update (about a week ago) did include some fixes/enhancements to ReAnnotate that have bugging me for years – so perhaps the improvements have started. Let’s hope so.

    A return to the old model of being able to subscribe to only the parts you need, in my case Schematic & PCB, would be another big step – assuming of course that there would be a commeasurate reduction in price.

  5. Re BDC’s comments

    “I’d rather see them go narrow and deep on a few core competencies than broad and shallow on a wide array of features designed to make their product brochure look good”.

    Not an engineer so excuse ignorance (own shares in ALU)…but – can “narrowness and deepness” be addressed via opening up of their DXP development platform?

    Re BDC’s comments

    “…while returning very little in the form of meaningful feature enhancements, such as a usable autorouter, to the core product

    and re dgaus comments

    “A working autorouter and some long standing bugs in PCb fixed would be much more useful.”

    Seems auto-routing is both loved and hated everywhere. See also “interactive routing” -http://www.altium.com/community/newsletters/february-09/en/interact…

  6. We appreciate everyone’s comments and feedback. Altium has always tried to make decisions in the best interest of our customers that allow us to deliver the products, content, and services our customers need. We rely on user feedback like this to ensure we stay on that track, so we ask that you continue to let us know how we’re doing, whether through our social channels on Facebook and Twitter or throughout the AltiumLive user forums. As part of the AltiumLive community, a system is available in which to submit and gather these suggestions – simply named Ideas. Thanks again!

    Lawrence Romine
    Altium

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
Aug 15, 2018
https://youtu.be/6a0znbVfFJk \ Coming from the Cadence parking lot (camera Sean) Monday: Jobs: Farmer, Baker Tuesday: Jobs: Printer, Chocolate Maker Wednesday: Jobs: Programmer, Caver Thursday: Jobs: Some Lessons Learned Friday: Jobs: Five Lessons www.breakfastbytes.com Sign ...
Aug 15, 2018
VITA 57.4 FMC+ Standard As an ANSI/VITA member, Samtec supports the release of the new ANSI/VITA 57.4-2018 FPGA Mezzanine Card Plus Standard. VITA 57.4, also referred to as FMC+, expands upon the I/O capabilities defined in ANSI/VITA 57.1 FMC by adding two new connectors that...
Aug 15, 2018
The world recognizes the American healthcare system for its innovation in precision medicine, surgical techniques, medical devices, and drug development. But they'€™ve been slow to adopt 21st century t...
Aug 14, 2018
I worked at HP in Ft. Collins, Colorado back in the 1970s. It was a heady experience. We were designing and building early, pre-PC desktop computers and we owned the market back then. The division I worked for eventually migrated to 32-bit workstations, chased from the deskto...
Jul 30, 2018
As discussed in part 1 of this blog post, each instance of an Achronix Speedcore eFPGA in your ASIC or SoC design must be configured after the system powers up because Speedcore eFPGAs employ nonvolatile SRAM technology to store its configuration bits. The time required to pr...