Xilinx vs. Altera tools for hobbyists

September 29, 2011 at 12:43 PM

Big Mess o’ Wires compared Xilinx and Altera’s FPGA tools:

I used to believe that Altera’s FPGA tools were much more hobbyist-friendly than the comparable Xilinx tools, and I frequently bashed the Xilinx tools whenever the topic came up. But after giving them a head-to-head comparison recently, I think I may have to eat my words. The truth is they’re both pretty rough and clunky, and difficult for a beginner to get the hang of, but the Xilinx tools are definitely superior in some important areas.

Continue reading

via Dangerous Prototypes

Please add a comment

kevin

What? No comments on this? I'm throwing down. Hey, readers - Which tools do you all like better for hobby-like applications? Don't limit yourselves to Xilinx and Altera.

Posted on September 29, 2011 at 5:22 PM

hayderimran

Well I used Xilinx for Spartan-3 and honestly I had a lot of difficulty getting on with xilinx tools... to be more precise,, their documentation/user manuals suck in a way there is lot of textual description..but no pictorial explanation of how to use them...
now I have been using Altera Quartus for like 8 months and I'm perfectly happy with that...
Altera Quartus indeed is easy, clear to understand and its like whole flow of tools linked with each other..
so if you are designing your FPGA , you do get what are you making while using quartus...
my favorite tool in Quartus is ''Block design" and " altera PLL's" ..they just make it simple for me ....
seriously , if you now look over internet, Altera's marketing is awesome ..I do see that Terasic technologies is doing wonderful job in making altera's product user-friendly. =)

Posted on September 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM

ICarlson

Tool usability and flow are important criteria for hobbyists, but cost is king. No one will pay several thousands of dollars for an EDK or SDK just to tinker around. In this case, Altera provides more tool-power for less money.

Altera gives users access to their entire software suite, which includes their system builder and SDK, as long as the user is targeting the Cyclone series and the lowest Arria II GX model--this includes most of the newest Cyclone V models, except for the highest densities. The cyclone supports gigabit transceivers, a few hundred DSP blocks, embedded logic analyzer (Signaltap) and hard-core ARM processors. Their IP, including the NIOS soft-core processor, have to be purchased separately. But I do know the NIOS can be had for as low as $500.

As far as I know, Xilinx only offers their logic edition of ISE, which doesn't include Chipscope or any of their EDK/SDK tool chains. Their web edition also only targets their lower-end FPGAs, similar to Altera.

I'm not an Altera rep. in any way and I'm not trying to push their products. But I've done some research I think they have a competitive advantage over Xilinx for hobbyists and independent consultants that want to save on tool costs.

Posted on December 19, 2011 at 3:43 PM

You must be logged in to leave a reply. Login »

« prev