editor's blog
Subscribe Now

Breker Tests Multicore

Earlier this year we were introduced to Breker, a company that generates C tests for stressing SoC architectures and verifying that things work even with bizarre corner code that someone writing directed tests might not think to create.

The original version supported a single CPU along with all of the surrounding circuitry. They have recently announced their multicore version. While this might sound like simply a matter of being able to run their previous tests on multiple CPUs, it’s far from that.

Multicore brings with it a whole slew of new things to go wrong. There may be bus clashes as multiple CPUs decide they’re in charge. You have resource contention and race conditions. There’s cache coherency – a deceptively complex architectural element required only for multicore.

All of these potential issues require tests that simply don’t exist for a single-core system. So moving to multicore is more than just about adding another CPU; it means developing a whole new set of test scenarios. So beyond just handling multiple CPUs, the new Breker tool version covers these multicore-specific issues.

You can find out more in their release.

Leave a Reply

featured blogs
May 25, 2018
As I mentioned in my last post , I attended one day of the Embedded Vision Summit this week, and as I did last year , I had a great time learning about vision applications in the AI landscape. Last year, I attended more of the '€œFundamentals'€ and '€œBusiness Insights...
May 25, 2018
A key component of any high-speed signal path is the interconnect.  Design engineers must identify the right connector (or connectors) and the best performance for the application. At 56 Gbps PAM4 data rates (and higher), connector selection becomes more challenging. Interco...
May 24, 2018
Amazon has apparently had an Echo hiccup of the sort that would give customers bad dreams. It sent a random conversation to a random contact. A couple had installed numerous Alexa-enabled devices in the home. At some point, they had a conversation '€“ as couples are wont to...